Windsurfing blog. Blog about my experience in windsurfing. How to learn and improve your windsurfing skills? Information from someone who is self-taught?
I'm really not the most regular blogger. I just don't take time to write. So now I have decided to try a new approach. Shorter and more frequent posts ... and lets see how this works out for me.
Many things happened since my last post. I came across a used reasonably priced JP Super Sport 118l PRO board model 2009. This board is a blast ... it is light and super fast ... much faster than shark and I also enjoy it much more than shark.
- Volume: 118 L
- Width: 69 cm
- Lenght: 250 cm
- Weight: 6,7 kg
- Fin: 42 cm G10 JP Freerace
I rode it only once with the 7,8 Challenger Fluido T3 sail. It was a great combo and was able to ride it well in overpowered conditions.
With the JP SS came also a mint 42 cm G10 fin which works well. My carbon 42 fin work even better but since I don't need two fins of the same size I decided to have carbon fin shortened to 38 cm and have it for 6,6 sail and use it also when riding overpowered wit 7,8. If I decide to sell the board I want to have original fin with it for the resale value.
Board has originally been damaged and repaired quite a few times but never took in any watter. Previous owner never had the graphics restored. Probably to keep reparation costs as low a possible, but I had it also repainted. It was done by CMD Mare. Guy does incredible job when repairing and restoring boards. He also does custom boards. Well now board looks really great. I'll try to post some images soon.
This review about Fanatic Shark had a great influence on my decision to go with this board, that is why I have decided to reblog the post on my page. (Fanatic Shark: rebloged from joe windsurfer). This is a board I have been looking at for a very, very long time. I was looking at the Fanatic Viper and Shark when the Viper first came out in 2005. The Viper was of interest because I was coming off an old longboard. The Shark interested me since then because it was a great potential starting shortboard ie no centreboard. Some of my fellow windsurfers seem to consider shortboards as those used in high winds only. That is fine, however, we do live in a light wind area.
I asked our local Fanatic salesman for his wisdom on the Shark. People are always calling it a "beginner" board. Well...in his words, font size and colour .... Most who talk shit, haven’t tried one. All who love and rave about them, own one. So tell me, who’s talking shit? Wisdom enough for ya? Bruno When I finally did purchase my first shortboard {brand new} in 2007, the Shark was a little more money. Perhaps I still should have chosen the Shark at that time due to its HRS cover {high resistance skin}. The AHD FastForward that I purchased did NOT have an extra protective coating and as such easily dented or scratched. This does not affect performance - only looks and resale value. Here is a Fanatic Video where the Shark and Hawk are discussed and described: That video has been removed from youtube - will try to find one similiar, butt for now here is one about the shark 2013... Better one found - Nik Baker speaking about the different Fanatic boards and how they compare...
As you saw, there are LTD versions of the 135 and 150 litre Shark models... These are more sensitive to dings and catapaults and require expertise. For myself, an HRS covering is useful and my skills may not even be up to determining performance differences between the HRS and LTD models. The Hawk is considered to be a free-ride more performance oriented Fanatic board. Once again, are your skills up to knowing the difference ? The Shark is the get up and go board = KISS.
Keep It Simple and Standard. or as I always say - let it RIP {and NO that is NOT rest in pieces :-) } What I like about the Shark is it can get you started and then take you really far. There seemed to be some concern when Fanatic changed the volume and dimensions, butt Tinho Dornellas, a master instructor of Calema Florida fame, has put those ideas to rest !! http://www.calema.com/forums/viewtopic.php?id=633 The Shark has many volumes - from 105 to 165 !! I thought it only went as far as 150. The widths are from 65 to 83 cm. At 83 cm the 165 liter board is cited as being able to handle a 10-oh sail and comes with a 52 cm fin. The more common sizes are the 120 and 135 litre models ... Even the 135 litre board with 73 cm width comes with a 48 cm fin and can handle sails up to 9-oh. http://www.fanatic.com/content/products/windsurfboards/shark/index_eng.html#.UZAZS6I8DTo So, these are easy riding boards that can handle quite large sails. This means they are ideal for light wind areas like where I live. Sails that large on flat water with an early planing board like this just blast. How much more performance does one need ?? Two things people worry about are tighter jibes and handling chop. These are critical performance areas as well. Let me see if we can find some magazine reviews for more detailed information ... The German Windsurf Magazine suggests that the 135 board is able to come out of turns at break neck speeds and even handles laydown jibes very well for its width. http://www.surf-magazin.de/test-center/freerideboards/fanatic-shark-135-ltd/ They do suggest a smaller fin for the smaller sails and this makes total sense since the supplied 48 cm fin is more aimed an 8-oh sails and this board can go all the way down to 6-oh where fins are typically under 40 cm !! In terms of performance the magazine is saying the board should satisfy the requirements for an amateur racer as well.
When Tinho evaluated the Shark 130 LTD originally he stated: " It swallows the chop. Actually, it flies over it. There is an occasional tip tap on incoming chop just to remind you of how fast you are going, but nothing like any of the bothersome clanker and raucous clatter of the competition. The jibe is great. Tight arcs, wide arcs, no problem. The standard fin is outstanding, light, proper twist, and perfectly matched to the board's function." This is why he was so concerned when Fanatic announced changes on this board. As seen earlier he raves about the new 135 even more !!
Found an article in the windsurfingmag of May 2006 where they reviewed the Fanatic Shark 145 LTD. They felt the Shark of this size was aimed at middle to heavyweights, planed early, had a steady jibe and went well at slow speeds ie schlogging. Several Experts gave the board a perfect ten rating !!! {It is unfortunate that this magazine is no longer with us - it is already missed dearly !!!}
http://epikoo.com/windsurfing/boards/fanatic-shark-2010 states The "Shark is a board especially dedicated to freeride lovers. And it is dedicated to both advanced or beginner riders, so that they will both enjoy high quality windsurfing sessions. The Shark is built on the successful pattern of the famous Eagle, but is more forgiving and tackles the waves in a gentle way so it can be used by beginner sailor without any effort or hassle. The shape is compact in features and has balanced rocker lines with a narrower tail which assure enough power for high speeds and extra maneuverability too. "
Let's see if we cannot find some videos :-)
I find it interesting that most of these videos are not of the marketing type. They are regular people going out and having simple fun. These boards are made to go out and have fun and yet still go fast !! The only negative comment I found was on the Auzzie forums where someone claimed it was too tame. From what I have seen and read, it may seem tame, butt it ain't lame :-)
The French Magazine Wind Magazine has a piece on the Shark 150 in FEB 2012. Hope there are no issues posting it here - I give them FULL credit !!! called "Liveliness in its Sweetness". I prefer to call it "lots of life in its soft ride". Soft ride is NOT a bad thing. It reminds me of when I rode in some sportier cars and found them to be too stiff and almost painful to ride. When going over chop, I prefer a softer ride over teeth chattering excitement. I will put some translation after ...
Translation: SHAPE Dating from 2010,theShark150 hasacompact shape, shorterand wider thanaverage. The board is well madewitha fin thatrequiresno tools tomount it.The HRS construction places theFanaticamong the lightestof the group!This board isalsoavailable inLTDbasedon carbonKevlar. {Personal Note: I would have thought the HRS made the board heavier. Also, what is interesting is, the HRS boards have NO vent plug !! }
On the Water Strap inserts straps placed back slightly on the outside of the deck on this Fanatic bring a very appreciable, driving comfort due to ergonomic feet position that perfectly matches the roundness of the rail. Globally stable, good travel speeds are still very accessible. The planing is attained smoothly while remaining very competitive. Onceplaning,this board is quick and fun tonavigate.It navigates onthe fin , very much alive on thewaterabove. Consequently, theFanatic goes over chopwithout tapping on it ;it goes over it. One does not feelanything underfootastheShark isaliveandfree, we provide effortlesscontrolaswe remain inmoderatewind conditionsfor the sail being used.
When Aeolus panics {Greek god of the winds freaks out} ,there is a tendency to lift in the gusts which may make the ride more technical. These flights mean the pilot needs to know how to control his board in changing conditions. The jibe excels in sweetness, is easy to engage and is scalable if one seeks to attack or to tighten the radius of the curve. Its thin rails on the back really helps to cut its curve to turn in place ie tight curves VERDICT Highly valued for its feel on the water, its ease of riding and ergonomic comfort, the Shark provides good sensations ie FUN. This is a design evolves continually to give pleasure even to a higher level of rider ie not just for beginners. If the conditions are alive, we may see a smaller range of sail use in strong winds, forcing down a sail size quickly, which can also be an advantage. It takes some basic skills and to be resourceful to be able to appreciate the true colours of the Shark! Once again, this board is NOT just for beginners and even suggest some skills to appreciate it.
Here is the Wind Magazine summary chart...
... here is a piece from WindSport Magazine 2013 gear guide- now realize i may not have listed specs
It is not totally
fair to compare the original fanatic shark fin with this since one is freeride
and other is freerace shape, so I'll just share my observations.
On land
As I have mentioned the Freerace fin fromBugfins is a carbon fin. It is superlight,
much narrower but still stiff enough. The Bugfins Freerace fin is 41 cm long
and has rake of 10 degrees. Nice strait shape. Nice smooth finish with visible
carbon fibers.
On the water - Shark with freerace character!
BUGFINS freerace fin enables me to get on plane faster than with
the original fanatic shark fin. I could get on plane also in marginal wind conditions
where I normally wouldn’t manage to get planing. It is incredibly fast. My Fanatic Shark 120 has become quite a freerace board with this fin. I could easily compete with other surfers on the water that were riding freerace and even slalom
boards.
In optimal conditions I had virtually no spin outs. I
could feel the bubble forming before the actual spin out happened and had time
to release the pressure, go a bit downwind and avoid the spin out. When over
powered there were less spinout as well (I was riding only the Challenger sails
Fluido T3 7,8 sail with three cambers). Upwind performance is also superior to
the fanatic shark freeride fin. It is slightly less maneuverable compared to sharks freeride shape but still enables me to turn
tight enough.
I recommend BUGFINS :)
All in all I am really satisfied with the freerace fin from BUGFINS and can
recommend it with no restrictions. I think you can get them also online. If you
are from Slovenia or somewhere close it is best to contactRajko. I think he has
some test fins that you can try before you buy them.
I am really satisfied with the ChallengerSails Fluido T3 7,8 so I decided to buy another one in the 6,6 size. This way I
would cover all my range of the Fanatic Shark 120 and the Fluido T3 6,6 I can
use also on the Fanatic hawk 93.
I did not get to
rig the sail until we were on vacations (Peljesac, Perna, Croatia). Here are
some of the photos:
When I assembled
the sail I noticed that there were numerous small dents in three monofilm
windows (not visible on the photos) so I disassembled it and packed it away.
Fortunately this year was really a bad one wind-wise and I was sailing only the
7,8.
Now I'm waiting to
meet Tine Slabe so he can check the sail and exchange it for another one. I'm
puzzled about how this could have happened because the sail was factory wrapped
when I opened it.